STUDY ON CHINA'S RURAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY UNDER RURAL REVITALIZATION STRATEGY: BASED ON QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT THEORY AND G1-ENTROPY VALUE METHOD
Keywords:
Rural Revitalization Strategy, Rural Economic Development, Economic Quality Assessment, Quality Function Deployment Theory, G1-entropy Value MethodAbstract
The rural revitalization strategy has become a major strategic deployment in China's economic development, which has an important impact on consolidating the achievements of China's precise poverty alleviation, further developing and growing the rural economy and the scale of China's rural industries. However, there is still a gap between the current level of rural economy and urban economy, and after the rural revitalization strategy is proposed, China's rural economy still presents problems such as single industrial model, backward infrastructure and low income level of farmers. Then how to carry out the optimization and sublimation of China's rural economy reform under the rural revitalization strategy has become a hot topic of current international and Chinese domestic research. Therefore, it is necessary to assess the quality of China's rural economic development in the context of rural revitalization strategy from a macroscopic perspective, and then provide support for relevant departments to designate policies. In this paper, we innovatively draw on the quality function deployment theory in marketing to build the overall logical framework of this study. Based on the analysis of existing studies, we construct an index system for assessing the quality of China's rural economic development based on four dimensions of industrial development, ecological governance, cultural construction and quality of life under the rural revitalization strategy. Meanwhile, we introduce expert identity weights in this paper, improve the G1 method in the traditional fuzzy mathematical theory, and combine the objective empowerment entropy value method to quantitatively calculate the index system, so as to obtain the ranking of the indexes. Finally, corresponding policy suggestions are proposed for the relevant index factors. Our research in this paper can provide practical experience for the relevant departments in China to carry out rural work, and more importantly, we provide specific suggestions and recommendations for the Chinese government's work in rural economic construction through the findings of this study, which can also provide theoretical and methodological references for similar economic optimization planning and research internationally.
References
Zhao YC, Cao SY. Research on forecast of coordinated development of economy and environment in coastal economic belt based on GM model [J]. Journal of coastal research,2020: 338-344
Xu H, Pan W, Xin M, Hu C, Pan WL, Dai WQ, Huang G. The mediating role of public health between environmental policy tools and economic development [J]. Energies,2022
JI Pulido-Fernández, PJ Cárdenas-García. Analyzing the Bidirectional Relationship between Tourism Growth and Economic Development [J]. Journal of Travel Research, 2021, 60(3):583-602.
Yuan, F. Research on the Impact Evaluation of Digital Finance on the Synergy between Economic Development and Ecological Environment [J]. Journal of environmental and public health,2022
Wang, GQ. Evaluation and Analysis of high Quality Economic Development Indicators by the Analytic Hierarchy Process Model [J]. Scientific Programming,2022
Adam I O. ICT Development, E-government Development, and Economic Development: Does Institutional Quality Matter? [J]. Information Technologies and International Development, 2020, 16:1-19.
Luthuli N, Houghton J. Towards regional economic development in South Africa: Conceptualising the 'region' associated with economic development through the Durban Aerotropolis[J]. Urbany izziv-urban chanllenge,2019: 194-211
Jin J, Zhao R. Endogenous Study on Economic Development, Environmental Investment, and Green Development Based on the Panel Data Analysis of 11 Provinces in the Yangtze River Economic Belt[J]. Journal of Coastal Research, 2019, 98(sp1):426.
Hall J L, Kanaan D Z. State Tax Policy, Municipal Choice, and Local Economic Development Outcomes: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach to Performance Assessment[J]. Public Administration Review, 2020.
Zhang L, Zhang N. The Role of Business Administration in Promoting Marine Economical Development[J]. Journal of Coastal Research, 2020, 103(sp1):209.
Kim S, Song M, Park H J. The network effect on the performance of local economic development[J]. Public Performance & Management Review, 2019, 42(3): 732-754.
Hu Y. A Study on the Long-term Mechanism of Marine Economic Development from SWOT Perspective[J]. Journal of Coastal Research, 2020, 107(SI): 249-252.
Zhang B, Qi R. Transportation infrustructure, innovation capability, and urban economic development[J]. Transformations in Business & Economics, 2021, 20.
Tu J. Evaluation Index System of Economic and Social Development Pilot Area Based on Spatial Network Structure Analysis[J]. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2022, 2022.
Hou P, Wu J. Construction of Path Selection Model for Economic Development of Coastal Rural Leisure Industry[J]. Journal of Coastal Research, 2019, 93(sp1):843.
Rustantono H, Soetjipto B E, Wahjoedi W, et al. Socio-Economic Factors and Rural Competitive Advantage: The Moderating Role of Economic Literacy[J]. Journal of Asian Finance Economics and Business, 2020, 7(8):151-159.
Brinkley, Visser M A. Socioeconomic and Environmental Indicators for Rural Communities: Bridging the Scholarly and Practice Gap [J]. Economic Development Quarterly, 2022, 36(2):75-91.
Rashid M F, Ngah I, Misnan S H. Framework for economic performance of rural areas in Malaysia: A territorial approach[J]. International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability, 2019, 6(1-2): 1-6.
Pavlik A, Zenka J. Economic resilience of European rural regions in 2000 - 2016: a case study of four EU countries
Authors[J]. Geographia cassoviensis, 2020,14 (2) : 178-191
Hennebry B. The determinants of economic resilience in rural regions. An examination of the Portuguese case[J]. Miscellanea Geographica. Regional Studies on Development, 2020, 24.
Barcus H R, Moseley W. SUSTAINING RURAL SYSTEMS: RURAL VITALITY IN AN ERA OF GLOBALIZATION AND ECONOMIC NATIONALISM[J]. Geographical Review, 2022, 112(3): 323-331.
Dimand R W, Saffu K. Economic Inequality and Rural Entrepreneurship: Polly Hill on Rural Capitalism in West Africa[J]. Taylor & Francis Journals, 2022.
Hughes C, Boss S. How Rural Public Libraries Support Local Economic Development in the Mountain Plains[J]. Public Library Quarterly, 2021, 40(3): 258-281.
Wang J, Deng X. Comprehensive Economic Benefit Evaluation Method of Coastal Enterprises Based on AHP[J]. Journal of Coastal Research, 2020, 103(sp1):24.
Gao M, Lu X. Evaluation Model of Eco-Environmental Economic Benefit Based on the Fuzzy Algorithm[J]. Advances in Meteorology, 2022, 2022.
Cao J, Xu F. Entropy-Based Fuzzy TOPSIS Method for Investment Decision Optimization of Large-Scale Projects[J]. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2022, 2022.
Xian S. Research on Comprehensive Evaluation of Economic Management Performance Based on Improved Fuzzy Clustering Algorithm[J]. Security and Communication Networks, 2022, 2022.
Sequeira T, Gil P M, Afonso S. Inflation, Complexity and Endogenous Growth[J]. CeBER Working Papers, 2019(23).
Huynh T L D, Wang M, VINH XUAN V O. Economic policy uncertainty and the bitcoin market: an investigation in the COVID-19 pandemic with transfer entropy[J]. The Singapore Economic Review, 2021.
G Büyükzkan, Mukul E, Kongar E. Health tourism strategy selection via SWOT analysis and integrated hesitant fuzzy linguistic AHP-MABAC approach[J]. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 2021, 74.
Hennebry B. Low carbon supplier selection using a hesitant fuzzy linguistic span method integrating the analytic networkprocess[J]. Transformations in bussiness & economics, 2019, 18 (2) :67-87
Majumdar A, Jeevaraj S, Kaliyan M, et al. Selection of resilient suppliers in manufacturing industries post-COVID-19: implications for economic and social sustainability in emerging economies[J]. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 2021.
Sen D K, Datta S, Mahapatra S S, et al. Sustainable supplier selection in intuitionistic fuzzy environment: a decision making perspective[J]. Bench marking An International Journal, 2018:00-00.
Bai C, Sarkis J. Honoring complexity in sustainable supply chain research: a rough set theoretic approach (SI:ResMeth)[J]. Production Planning and Control, 2018, 29(16):1367-1384.
Bleichrodt H, Miyamoto J. A characterization of quality-adjusted life-years under cumulative prospect theory[J]. Mathematics of Operations Research, 2003, 28(1): 181-193.
Hsu C H, Chang A Y, Luo W. Identifying key performance factors for sustainability development of SMEs–integrating QFD and fuzzy MADM methods[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 161: 629-645.
Chowdhury M M H, Quaddus M A. A multi-phased QFD based optimization approach to sustainable service design[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2016, 171: 165-178.
Tseng Y H, Lin C T. Enhancing enterprise agility by deploying agile drivers, capabilities and providers[J]. Information Sciences, 2011, 181(17): 3693-3708.
Haiyun C, Zhixiong H, Yüksel S, et al. Analysis of the innovation strategies for green supply chain management in the energy industry using the QFD-based hybrid interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy decision approach[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2021, 143: 110844.
Ghanbary S, Sharifi S M, Momeni S. OFD platform: consumers’ persuasion based on economic, relational and enjoyment values[J]. Journal of Foodservice Business Research, 2022, 25(3): 329-352.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Xu Yige, He Jing , Wang Suyu (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
